Clearly the problem is

XXXXXXXX 


:-(

Actually, this IS NOT an example of a redistributed message, but instead a LISTSERV administrative message back to the original poster of the attempt of the duplicate posting.  

/pete

At 05:12 4/13/2006 Thursday, Eggleston Scott wrote:
>This is one of the headers from the redistributed e-mails
>
>Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
>Received: from XXXXXXXX ([XXXXXXXX]) by XXXXXXXX with Microsoft
>SMTPSVC(XXXXXXXXX);
>	Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:07:59 +0000
>Received: from XXXXXX ([XXXXXXX]) by XXXXXXXXXX with Microsoft
>SMTPSVC(XXXXXXXXXX);
>	Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:08:06 +0000
>Received: from XXXXXXXX ([XXXXXXXXX]) by XXXXXXXX with Microsoft
>SMTPSVC(XXXXXXXXXX);
>	Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:17:18 +0000
>Date:         Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:37:38 +0000
>From:         "XXXXXXXXXX" <XXXXXXXXXX>
>Subject: Message ("Your message dated Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:10:29
>-0000...")
>To:           No Name Available <XXXXXXXXXX>
>Message-ID:   <XXXXXXXXXX>
>Return-Path: <>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2006 19:17:18.0500 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[16AE3E40:01C63EF7]
>
>
>Any ideas ? 
>
>
> 
> 
> 
>Scott Eggleston
>
>Senior Systems Engineer
>
>Systems & Applications
>
>NHS Connecting For Health (NPfIT)
>
>0113 397 3409
>
>[log in to unmask] 
>
>www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk
>
> 
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete Weiss
>Sent: 12 April 2006 17:47
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Redistribution of old messages
>
>At 12:29 4/12/2006 Wednesday, Stan Horwitz wrote:
>
>>Can  you post a copy of the full header for one of those replicated 
>>messages to this list?
>
>
>Just to be sure, post full-headers from a set (two) of dups.  This may
>help pin-point where the differences start to occur (reading from the
>bottom UP of the RECEIVED line headers).
>
>/Pete 
>
>This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended 
>recipient please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or 
>distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on 
>its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please 
>inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you 
>for your co-operation.
End Reply