> -----Original Message-----
> From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [mailto:LSTSRV-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Valdis Kletnieks
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:39 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: send=editor question
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:22:41 CST, Al Lilianstrom said:
> > We have a number of announce only lists set up with send=editor which
> works
> > great. It was brought to our attention today that if an editor is
> also a list
> > member that they don't get a copy of any mail that they send to the
> list. Is
> > this the expected behavior?
>
> The fact they're an editor is probably a red herring.  For *all* lists,
> whether
> a subscriber gets a copy back is governed by the REPRO setting.

Right. We have a web form that users use to request a list and REPRO is a default option in the list configuration that is generated by the form. It's been that way for so long that I forgot all about the setting.

The list in question was created manually so the default-options was never set.

> If the person wants a copy, they should send Listserv the command:
>
> SET listname REPRO
>
> (Also, check whether the list has a Default-Options: set...)
>
> Ignore this if the user actually *has* REPRO set and still isn't
> getting
> a copy - that would be a different issue. ;)

Thanks for the help.

        al

--

Al Lilianstrom
CD/LSC/CSI/CSG
[log in to unmask]