Just based on the fact that the key is called 
"SuppressOOFsToDistributionLists", I would guess that this wouldn't 
turn them off completely, just to list messages (which I would guess 
is based on the Precedence: List header). That's a lot of guessing on 
my part, but if you've got Exchange, it seems like it's worth looking 
into (and let us know what you find).

Francoise


On 18 Aug 2006 at 10:10, Jeff Kiesel wrote:

> Jeff,
> 
> I csn't turn off the OOO's because people need them on to communicate to
> customers, etc.  I would really love to though...
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Kell [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:55 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Sender receiving OOO Replies
> 
> Jeff Kiesel wrote:
> > So I think I have a better understanding of the OOO problem, and why
> > ListServ setting won't stop it.
> >
> > Outlook's autoresponder doesn't pay any attention to the Reply-To header.
> > It responds to the From header.  So any OOO sent from an Outlook client,
> > will never be sent to listserv, but right to the poster.
> >
> > A different email client may have an autoresponder that uses the Reply-To
> > header.  In this case the OOO will be sent to ListServ, and this is why we
> > need to provide for OOO messages in CONTENT_FILTER.
> 
> Aaargh! 
> 
> Most of the OOOs are coming from Exchange.
> 
> Turn them off!
> 
> Location:
> HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIS\ParametersSystem
> Value: SuppressOOFsToDistributionLists
> Type: REG_DWORD
> Value Data: 1
> 
> Jeff

-- 
Francoise Becker

There is only one LISTSERV(R) -- the product that launched the 
email list communication industry in 1986. To discover the 
story behind LISTSERV, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/corporate/20anniversary.asp