On Wed, 27 Sep 89 08:57:53 IST Zvika Bar-Deroma said:
>On Mon, 25 Sep 89 14:04:37 SET Christian J. Reichetzeder said:
>>On Mon, 25 Sep 89 12:19:15 IST Zvika Bar-Deroma said:
>>>I got complaints from users subscribed to SAS-L, ....
>>>The users get their SAS-L list distributed from [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>Haven't seen  any problems. SAS-L is  DIST2 and for almost  all recipients the
>>job is forwarded to [log in to unmask] Maybe Olivier Martin knows more.
>>Christian
>
>Well - reading your answer I REViewed SAS-L (is there no way to
>REV the subscribers on one machine only ? It could save network
Add the LOCAL parm the the review
>resources....). There's not even ONE subscriber from TECHNION (checked
>all peers). I positively know of two people who were subscribed
>and did not UNSUB (am afraid they donno how to "accomplish" this).
>About 5 other people were also subscribed, but I don't know them
>personally, so I cannot be 100% sure they did nothing...
>
>Any idea what could have gone wrong ??
If SAS-L received a rejection trying to deliver to them, then I
deleted them from the list.  SAS-L has too much volume for me not to
do this, and too many people leave without  unsubing, or their NAD doing
it for them.
>
>/Zvika
>
>p.s. - I told the complainers to resubscribe, so that eliminates
>       their personal problem.