> >I have not received BITNEWS for some time either.  I was assuming that
> >none had been sent.  Is that wrong?
>
> >Roger
>
> I haven't pulled the archive since early May so I'm not sure either
> if there has been anything new but I'd be willing to bet there has
> been.  At the time I last pulled it there were several items,
> including the ones about all the staff changes at BITNIC, that we
> had never received here.  SLACVM is also not getting BITNEWS and
> there were some reports that at least some people at Cornell were
> also not getting it so it doesn't appear to be a strictly geographic
> problem.  The only thing I could guess is that somehow the large
> size of that list caused it to break after sending stuff to only
> part of the list (STANFORD and SLACVM both being toward the end),
> but if Cornell isn't getting things either that theory wouldn't
> appear to hold up either as I believe all their nodes start with C.
>
> /June
 
I pulled the archives and found several BITNEWS messages that I had not
received.  The problem seems to have started around early to mid April.
The latest posting in the archives is dated June 27.