----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> I FULLY AGREE with this viewpoint.  I don't like them either, and MOST
> ESPECIALLY when they tell me that 0 COPIES WERE SENT TO 0 PEOPLE !!!!!
>
> I don't know why you did not address this to LSTSRV-L; are you on that
> list?  I think it is a LISTSERV problem.  Should I pass this on to the
> list LSTSRV-L?
>
> > To:       MATHEWS@UGA, DANNO@UIUCVMD, POSTMAST@FINHUTC
> > From:     "Roger Fajman" <RAF@NIHCU>
> > Date:     Thu, 02 Oct 86  15:22:04 EDT
> > Subject:  Unnecessary messages
> >
> > I would prefer not to receive messages such as those reproduced
> > below.  Thanks.
> >
> > FROM LISTSERV@UGA: * PROCESSING YOUR MAIL (0656) FOR IBM-NETS...
> > FROM LISTSERV@UGA: * YOUR MAIL CREATED 1 OUTBOUND FILES FOR 3 RECIPIENTS.
> > FROM LISTSERV@UGA: * 2 MAIL FILES HAVE BEEN SENT TO LOCAL RECIPIENTS.
> >
> > FROM LISTSERV@UIUCVMD: * PROCESSING YOUR MAIL (1224) FOR IBM-NETS...
> > FROM LISTSERV@UIUCVMD: * 1 MAIL FILES HAVE BEEN SENT TO LOCAL RECIPIENTS.
> >
> > FROM LISTSERV@FINHUTC: * YOUR MAIL FILE (9615) WAS SUCCESSFULLY PROCESSED
> >                          FOR LIST IBM-NETS.
 
I am not on the LSTSRV-L list.  Where is it?  Anyway, feel free
to pass it on there.