Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: UUENCODE format
From:
"John F. Chandler" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 1992 22:04:00 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
> This is simply  the way the program LISTSERV uses  for UUENCODE works (it
> has its own reasons which were explained  to me once and which I promptly
> forgot  - it  was  designed for  PC  software).
 
I guess that makes a certain kind of sense.  The encoded output stopped
after exactly 128 bytes, but I don't understand how an encoder that
won't handle more than 128 bytes can be said to "work."  Could it be
that the program on CMS reads no more that 128 bytes from each *record*?
 
>  In the  particular case  of transient  MODULEs, there  is a
> rather legitimate case for wanting to  use UUENCODE to retrieve the file,
 
I agree, and, since SPRSHO is such a module (more specifically, a system-
key, transient-area module), I would have thought that the UUENCODER was
ideal for the task.  If, however, it can't read more than 128 bytes from
any one record, then I guess it isn't.
 
> but what about regular MODULE's?
 
Well, maybe not, although there is another special case that could
perhaps use it, namely, modules with no symbol table or RLD data.
Those could be reconstructed, although it would be a nuisance to
have to clip off the first 80 bytes.
                                     John

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV