On 20 Nov 1992 23:03:14 GMT [log in to unmask] (Eric Thomas) said:
...
>My  complaint is  that your  server identifies  itself as  'unix listserv
>version x.y' or something similar. Many  users won't read the helpfile in
>which  you explain  which  is which.  I  would like  you  to change  this
>misleading identifier to something like  'unix list manager version x.y',
>or you could choose a "name" for your server like the Mailbase folks did.
>As long  as it doesn't  say "listserv for  unix" or something  similar, I
>don't care what you call it.
 
And "unix list server version x.y" canNOT be considered acceptable
wording, for obvious reasons.
 
 
>since unix is unanimously considered to be the system of the future
 
I most strenuously object to this concept, specifically in relation
to the CASUAL COMPUTER USER.  At the rate unix is developing, it
will need at least 10-15 more years before becoming anything
resembling a user-friendly environment.  No application I have tried
on unix gives me a feeling of "Hey, this looks like it's easy to
use!".  (even MS/PC-DOS is less unfriendly!)
 
 
Regards.
$$/