LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Harold Pritchett <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 26 Mar 1992 15:00:58 EST
text/plain (52 lines)
On Thu, 26 Mar 1992 13:59:44 EST Hobart Braden said:
>On Mon, 23 Mar 1992 14:50:29 EST Michael Harpe said:
>>...
>>I have a list defined with the keyword Send= Private set.  We are a site that
>>is on both BITNET and the Internet.  Our mail system is changing our local
>>addresses from someone@ulkyvm to [log in to unmask] before sending
>>them to LISTSERV.  I have set MYDOMAIN = 'ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE.EDU' in LOCAL
>>SYSVARS.
>>
>>The trouble is, people who are subscribed as someone@ulkyvm in the list
>>cannot post to the list with Send= Private set.  If I change their entry
>>to [log in to unmask], it works.  Shouldn't the two forms be
>>synonomous in this case?
>>...
>
>I have been trying to follow the discussion of this thread on the list
>because I'm looking for the answer to the same question about senders at
>sites _other_ than where the list is hosted.  My issue is not about the
>proper way to define 'Local' on my server, but rather about e-mail
>addresses which may be functionally equivalent, but which make the
>sender unrecognizeable as a subscriber.  I see LISTSERV refusing to
>accept a posting to a private list from a subscriber with a domain-style
>address, when the list entry for the subscriber has a BITNET address.
>(Or not recognizing the 'equivalence' of two domain-style addresses.)
>For example:
>
>   the posting has  >From: [log in to unmask]
>   the list has            subscr@HOST
>
>                 - or -
>
>   the posting has  >From: [log in to unmask]
>   the list has            [log in to unmask]
>
>I have assumed that it was not reasonable to expect LISTSERV to know
>in the examples above that 'subscr' was really a subscriber.
>My naive response to these problems has been to recommend that the
>list owner change the entry for the subscriber to match what would be
>appearing in the e-mail 'From' entry.  Is there, in fact, something
>better that I could do to have it recognize these equivalences?
 
There is nothing else YOU can do.  The right answer is for the admin at
bitnet node HOST to insert a :internet. tag in his entry in BITEARN NODES
with the value
 
     :internet.HOST.XYZ.EDU
 
This will cause listserv to recognize that bitnet node HOST and internet
node HOST.XYX.EDU are the same machine, and do all the right things.
 
Harold

ATOM RSS1 RSS2