I do remember why IETF was a bad option: the subject prefix goes away
and we'd like to keep that.

In short, how do I get IETF with subject prefix? And if it cannot be
done, is there a reason why?

Thanks!

--
____________________________________
Mike Neuharth <[log in to unmask]>
Server Operations Manager
phn: 612.625.1957
cal: http://tinyurl.com/3jc2v
=====================================
College of Food, Agricultural, and Natural Resource Sciences
University of Minnesota
http://www.cfans.umn.edu/




On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Rich Greenberg wrote:

> On: Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:03:45PM -0600,mjn Wrote:
>
> } User1 is a member of LIST-A and LIST-B, she can post to either.
> User2
> } is on LIST-B and is allowed to post to LIST-A. User1 has an
> important
> } message for users on LIST-A and LIST-B so she sends out a note with
> } both lists in the 'To:' field. User2 was in the same meeting and see
> } the message come across from LIST-B but, in looking at the default
> } display of headers, doesn't see LIST-A in the 'To:' field so he
> } forwards the message on to LIST-A thus getting it sent to the same
> } group twice and likely annoying many.
>
> Besides what Jacob suggested, if you examine the full headers (which
> you
> will have to convince your mailer to show you) there should be a
> "Comments-To:" line(s) showing other adressees.
>
> --
> Rich Greenberg  N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 239
> 543 1353
> Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself & my dogs only.    VM'er
> since CP-67
> Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians
> Owner:Chinook-L
> Retired at the beach                                     Asst
> Owner:Sibernet-L
>