On Fri, 27 Oct 89 15:19:54 GMT Eric Thomas said:
>Turgut, you have a strange definition of "up to date"... What really puzzles
>me is where they have *managed* to find these outdated tables - it's very hard
>nowadays to find 3-weeks-old tables, you find either up to date ones, tables
>Revised LISTSERV, version 1.5o, managed by:
> NETOP@ICNUCEVM
>Peers file version:        89/10/02 16:34:21
>Link weights file version: 89/10/02 16:37:25
 
It would seem that they updated their tables manually, once.
I am cc:'ing Laura to this message, and I HOPE she joins this list.  -turgut