Any explanation for why this message ended up in the bit bucket?  There's
no such subscriber on any of our lists, it's not even a topic our lists
cover, and it doesn't sound like spam.  One of life's unsolved
mysteries?  /Karl

>Received: from cpcug.org (cpcug.org [205.197.248.25])
>         by cpcug.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11969;
>         Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:41:14 -0400 (EDT)
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>Date:         Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:41:14 -0400
>From: "L-Soft list server at Capital PC User Group (1.8d)"
>               <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      Problem processing mail file from [log in to unmask]
>To: "Karl Signell (dig" <[log in to unmask]>, Gabe Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>,
>         Scott Mohnkern <[log in to unmask]>
>X-UIDL: 32cf77491496302e46c50c94f784167f
>
>An error  occurred while processing  file 34827 from  [log in to unmask]: "Mail
>message sent to the LISTSERV address contains invalid RFC822 fields and could
>not be parsed successfully".
>
>RFC822 parser messages follow:
>
><W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored.
>
>------------------- Message causing the problem (17 lines)
>--------------------
>Received: from mail2.fcgnetworks.net (mail2.fcgnetworks.net [208.210.86.12])
>         by cpcug.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11961
>         for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from smtp.fcgnetworks.net (man6-pool-12.fcgnetworks.net
>[208.210.87.76])
>         by mail2.fcgnetworks.net (8.9.2/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA14679;
>         Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:40:52 -0400 (EDT)
>Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:40:52 -0400 (EDT)
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>FROM: Open Arms Outreach <[log in to unmask]>
>SUBJECT: to be accepted.  Color
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Priority: 3
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: undisclosed-recipients:;
>
>   As a young woman on mixed ethnic background, I would, of course, prefer
> a diverse school community.  I would not, however, want to receiver
> preference because of my color.  Blacks have fought for equality for many
> years, but to be given acceptance to a school based only on their race is
> selling them short.  If I found I had been accepted for anything merely
> because of my color, I would be outraged.