GET may not work if the list is corrupt.  If it does, that would certainly
be preferable, yes.

Nathan

At 02:13 PM 11/10/2003 -0500, UB Listserv Administrator wrote:
>Wouldn't it just be easier to just issue a GET command to listserv
>for FEMINAMAIL.LIST, edit out any junk and then PUT it back? Or
>is there something lacking with doing it that way that using
>listview is necessary?
>
>-Jim
>
>--
>Jim Serwinowski                 [log in to unmask]
>UB Listserv Administrator       http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu
>
>
>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Nathan Brindle wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:29:55 -0500
> > From: Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
> > Reply-To: LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Same email going out 4 times
> >
> > At 04:29 PM 11/7/2003 -0500, John Lyon wrote:
> > >listview.exe  usually installs when installing LISTSERV. Mine (windows) is
> > >in the spool directory. The proper switch is actually  -a, (my mistake),
> > >listview is discussed in Chapter 5.3.
> >
> > It's unix, so Nelly would have to build listview from source if she doesn't
> > have it, ie, with
> >
> > make listview
> >
> > since the Makefile does not automatically build a listview executable under
> > unix.  Nelly, if you no longer have the source kit, you can get it by
> > downloading these two files:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.lsoft.com/listserv/unix/old-1.8d/Solaris.tar.Z
> > ftp://ftp.lsoft.com/listserv/unix/old-1.8d/common.tar.Z
> >
> > (It appears that you're running 1.8d, so that's why I'm pointing to
> that kit.)
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> >
> >