>How about using the USENET keyword of NEWSGROUP: and making that a
>replyable field with a higher priority than that of Sender: for
>notification/rejection purposes. Not that I intend to redefine the
>way that RFC822 works - but if MAs like MAILBOOK are going to be
>picky - then I consider it our duty to find a way around it in order
>to keep a more efficient distributed-mail-network. yes?
>            - Michael Gettes, Boston University
>I guess this is meant for Eric since he is the only one responding.
I'm certainly willing to change MAILBOOK to use the Newsgroup header
line.  We need to be sure that some consensus is there, however.
 
Richard
(author of MAIL/MAILBOOK)