..oops! I sometimes hate the reply-to: tag.. Maybe we should tell this to
someone: if the msg is forwarded, and is replied back, don't look
at the reply-to tag?  Anyway, my apologies..
 
Since now I found an opportunity, I can reply to another matter:
 
I really mind the dirty talking, 'only 13 sites, and two later on declined'
business - we work hard here for the code, so what if over 1/4 of the EARN
servers sites have signed the contract?
 
You must have seen the recent changes, like the path-bug and the
BSMTP work.. It works fine here, but I need some test sites as well.
Please let me know if you would volunteer to test it. Its net
effect was pleasant here  - the users no longer see their own net
addresses on top of the msg, but the 'multiple recipients' thing, but
listserv gets through a DIST job in a record time, with one copy to
the mailer..   regards, -turgut