Tue, 22 May 90 18:31:55 O
|
>Does the same hold true substituting "list owner" for "users" in the
>above?
Yes. Basically, what will NOT work is postmasters (who probably won't
want to send commands via mail anyway, since this requires password
validation) and all the other similar configuration file variables like
privileged mail forwarding users, etc. There would be too many places in
the code to change, and potential problems in case of troubles - the
postmaster list is ALSO an "emergency bosses" list. It works for users,
owners, NAD's, list editors, FAC codes, and DISTRIBUTE/best peer
placement. I haven't found any satisfactory way to make it work for the
support of the LOCAL variable in mail distribution with "Mail-via=
DIRECT" and non-BSMTP headers - I mean, I know how to write the code but
the performance impact would be too much, I prefer to keep it the way it
is now.
Unfortunately I lost friday-monday on a hardware disk problem (as you
might have seen on LINKFAIL), and today on a series of meetings. I guess
I have 2-3 days of work left.
Eric
|
|
|