What on earth is the import of this rather boring and vaguely
 threatening line of questioning?  Could it be carried on
 offline' please?
 
 
> if your board members are committed to l-soft then they shouldn't
> have any problem identifying themselves.  they also shouldn't feel
> obliged to publish their addresses.
>
> more fundamentally:  is l-soft privately held, and is l-soft planning to
> remain privately held?  what role does your board of directors play?