> ----------
> From:         A. Harry Williams[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:         Tuesday, January 27, 1998 11:17 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Prime time question.
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 09:35:54 -0600 David Young said:
> Even without seeing this, and find their rationale a little weak,
> I was going to suggest either manual, or automatic use of the command
> HOLD listname.  Put it in a schedular package, or potentially
> even in Listserv's WAKEPARM FILE.  That way they'll also get
> a nice little reminder that it is held, and they can override
> with a FREE if they wish.
>
Good idea, and I had considered it.  However, my server runs on NT
Workstation 3.51 and, until today in fact, the AT command was not
working for me.  I think our NT administrator resolved that problem and
I'll try that method.
I also considered having the owner manually HOLD/FREE it, but dropped
that idea after remembering the labor pains I went through when the list
was created and the trouble I had getting them to send to the list
address instead of to the server when posting.  Thanks.

C. David Young
Academic Computing Services
Central Systems Support
University Of Texas At Arlington
Voice: (817) 272-3152
Fax: (i17) 794-5796