On: Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 01:02:40PM -0800,Eckstine, Nate Wrote:

} The encoding and decoding of the email is probably the difference.  I discourage people from using the digest format unless they are brave enough to manage their email client and accept the consequences.
}
} But if someone is digesting the mail and they receive garbage I adjust them to another format until one works, if all have problems they need a different email client.
}
} IMO when you digest emails out to the internet you will end up managing the person's desktop for them. It's not feasible in a large organization. I don't think digesting is well suited to an email client when threaded lists and facebook are alternatives.

Thanks Nate, but some of my readers prefer Digest.  I haven't managed
anyones desktop, and have had no complaints about garbage (yet).

--
Rich Greenberg  Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 941 378 2097
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself & my dogs only.    VM'er since CP-67
Canines: Val,Red,Shasta,Zero,Casey & Cinnar (At the bridge)   Owner:Chinook-L
Canines: Red & Max (Siberians)     Retired at the beach  Asst Owner:Sibernet-L

############################

To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1