Anyone know what Done Split this? :-).
*** Start Included Message ***
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU by PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU (Mailer R2.10 ptf008) with
BSMTP id 5949; Wed, 25 Jan 95 16:45:01 EST
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
(LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7003; Wed, 25 Jan 1995 12:54:30 -0500
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 1995 12:54:29 -0500
From: "L-Soft list server at CUNYVM (1.8b)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RAILROAD/DONE-SPLIT: error report from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
To: "Geert K. Marien" <[log in to unmask]>
X-LSV-ListID: None
The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list
RAILROAD/DONE-SPLIT because it was sent to the reserved
'owner-railroad/done-split' mailbox.
------------------------------ Message in error -------------------------------
Received: from CUNYVM (NJE origin SMTP3@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail
V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6955; Wed, 25 Jan 1995 12:54:11 -0500
Received: from ns3.mke.ab.com by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
Wed, 25 Jan 95 12:54:07 EST
Received: by ns3 (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA03675; Wed, 25 Jan 95 11:52:16 CST
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU by ns3.mke.ab.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA03588; Wed, 25 Jan 95 11:50:08 CST
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 3303; Wed, 25 Jan 95 12:36:17 EST
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
(LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5583; Wed, 25 Jan 1995 12:36:11 -0500
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8b) with
NJE id 2420 for [log in to unmask]; Wed, 25 Jan 1995 12:35:45
-0500
Return-Path: <@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from CUNYVM (NJE origin SMTP3@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail
V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5414; Wed, 25 Jan 1995 12:34:22 -0500
Received: from UA1VM.UA.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
Wed, 25 Jan 95 12:34:20 EST
Received: from UA1VM.UA.EDU by UA1VM.UA.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id
2461; Wed, 25 Jan 95 11:23:41 CST
Received: from UA1VM (NJE origin STHOMA@UA1VM) by UA1VM.UA.EDU (LMail
V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0609; Wed, 25 Jan 1995 11:23:41 -0600
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 1995 10:58:34 CST
Reply-To: The Railroad List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: The Railroad List <[log in to unmask]>
From: "list Stephen J. Thoma" <[log in to unmask]>
To: Multiple recipients of list RAILROAD <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: AMTRAK in Alabama
There are some recent developments in the AMTRAK saga in Alabama that may
interest readers. First, Fob James (our new Republican Gov.) and his
Transportation advisor have decided to withdraw the 403b monies that were
budgeted for the Birmingham to Mobile route. This is important because
those state leaders who were trying to save the route had counted on this
money plus new monies from Mississippi and Louisiana to keep the route
open and extend it to New Orleans via the Mississippi coast (and right
by the new Casinos located along the proposed route). The main idea of this
plan was to keep both The Cresent and the Mobile extention open keeping
in mind AMTRAK's decision to proceed with reduced service. What this does
is pit the proposed route cities against Tuscaloosa, Meridian, etc. for the
3 days-a-week route. Interestingly and following Fob's announcement, a
new rumor surfaced: bypass Birmingham altogether and run the route from
Atlanta directly to Montgomery and then south along the coast to New Orleans.
Proponents of this plan suggest it will be faster and more economical.
The logic of the James' administrations decision is very sad. Basically
they suggest that the train could not pay for itself, probabily never
would so continued funding is "good money after bad" ---I wonder how
Alabam's roads would hold up under similar scrutiny and assumptions.
*** End of included message ***
|
