>                                                                            Am
>I correct in assuming that the MTA at the sending node is trashing the RFC
>headers by placing them in an improper order ? And if I am correct - there is
>nothing that I can do on this end ?
>
>
>>Received: from CORNELLC by PCCVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 2486; Wed
>,
>> 18 Dec 91 11:29:27 PST
>>Received: from CORNELLC by CORNELLC (Mailer R2.08A) with BSMTP id 7717; Wed, 1
>8
>> Dec 91 14:28:15 EST
>>Received: from HAMLET by CORNELLC.cit.cornell.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
>>   Wed, 18 Dec 91 14:28:14 EST
>>Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1991 13:28 CDT
>>From: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: SUB CANINE-L Charlotte Burr
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Message-id: <[log in to unmask]>
>>X-Envelope-to: [log in to unmask]
>>X-VMS-To: IN%"[log in to unmask]"
 
What's wrong with the order of the headers?
----------
Mark J Strawcutter                           BitNet:    MJSTRAW@IUP
Director, Systems and Communications         DNS (mx):  [log in to unmask]
Indiana University of Pennsylvania           Voice:     (412) 357-4000
Indiana, PA   15705                          "you can't nail jello to a tree"