|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 90 15:04:00 EDT |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
At first glance, the following message looked like evidence of the
message stuttering that Scott has been complaining about, but the
"received" tags suggest otherwise. Does this mean that VM-UTIL might
be improperly peered together?
For reference, here are excerpts from the list definition:
*
* VM Utilities Discussion List
*
* Review= Public Subscription= Open
...
* Peers= OHSTVMA,DEARN,TECMTYVM,MARIST,UBVM,UCF1VM,UTARLVM1
* Peers= TREARN
...
*
* MARIST
* |
* TECMTYVM <-> UTARLVM1 <-> OHSTVMA <-> UBVM <-> DEARN <-> TREARN
* |
* UCF1VM
Here is the rejection notice:
>Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 12:30:09 EDT
>From: Revised List Processor (1.6e) <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Rejected posting to VM-UTIL@UBVM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been
>already sent to the VM-UTIL list....
>------------------------- Rejected message (34 lines) -------------------------
>Received: from TREARN.BITNET by ubvm.BITNET (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 0798;
> Wed, 10 Oct 90 12:28:09 EDT
>Received: by TREARN (Mailer R2.07) id 0393; Wed, 10 Oct 90 18:29:35 TUR
>Received: from ubvm.BITNET by TREARN.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0391;
> Wed, 10 Oct 90 18:29:29 TUR
>Received: by UBVM (Mailer R2.05) id 0758; Wed, 10 Oct 90 12:25:28 EDT
>Received: from OHSTVMA.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU by ubvm.BITNET (Mailer R2.05) with
> BSMTP id 0753; Wed, 10 Oct 90 12:25:06 EDT
>Received: by OHSTVMA (Mailer R2.07) id 8945; Wed, 10 Oct 90 12:27:11 EDT
>Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vm-util
>Date: Wed, 10 Oct 90 12:10:00 EDT
>Reply-To: VM Utilities Discussion List <VM-UTIL@TREARN>
>Sender: VM Utilities Discussion List <VM-UTIL@TREARN>
>From: "John F. Chandler" <PEPMNT@CFAAMP>
>Subject: Re: Time mod for CP
>X-LSVRepTo:
>X-LSVopts: MSGACK Org=VM-UTIL@TREARN
>X-LSVvia: VM-UTIL@OHSTVMA VM-UTIL@UBVM VM-UTIL@TREARN
>To: $PEER$ <VM-UTIL@UBVM>
>In-Reply-To: [log in to unmask] message of Tue, 9 Oct 90 16:51:43 EDT
>
>... text deleted ...
|
|
|