Eric,
This mail file was delivered to me by LISTSERV@BITNIC, which is now
of course running your code. The addressess (in Reply-To:, X-To:, and
From:) are quite ugly, no? This is not an isolated case, and appears quite
often on mail from the TCPIP-L@BYUADMIN list. What is happening here?
Ross
P.S. Why am I seeing the "Warning -- RSCS tag ..."? Does Listserv not know
about WISCVM? RAP
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
I received a letter today, mailed yesterday, dated January 28, which would
indicate reason has prevailed. The body follows (asterisks are used to bracket
words in boldface):
Thank you for your comments.
Originally, it was our understanding that the CLASS parameter must be
specified when defining *all* unsupported device types. We now realize,
thanks to your recent letter, there are exceptions. Therefore, the
following note will be added to the book at the next available opportunity:
For *most* unsupported VM/SP devices, the CLASS operand should
be specified. However, exceptions can occur when the software
being used is primarily handling the device. In this situation,
specifying the CLASS operand may *not* be required.
We apologize for any inconvenience that may have occurred. Thank you for
your time and interest.
and it was sent by Mr. McGoldrick. While I would word it differently, I say,
"Bravo!" We all win. In this case, the time invested in the RCF process was
profitable.
|