On Wed, 14 Jul 1999 19:28:07 -0700, Jessica Rasku
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>        Could you elaborate on why this is?  Or, at least point to
>information explaining this in further depth?  I'm SURE there is a very
>good reason for this, I just don't see it... (yet...).

From another posting to this list on July 2:

http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind9907&L=lstsrv-l&P=R419

The CJLI syntax is documented in the LISTSERV Developer Guide

 http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/index.html

The proof is left as an exercise for the student...     ;-)
(I hated it when my college profs said that.)