It's sort of defined in the 1.8D manual under the generic parameter
'access-level'.  And totally stackable.  For some reason, I've always used
caps for the list name, ie. Send= (LISTB), and it totally works.

Jean Snow

On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, F J Kelley wrote:

> They appear to be stackable, though there may be a limit to the stack.  However, as mentioned, I cannot find this defined in the manuals, so no idea as to any limitations or requirements.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Pete Weiss [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 3:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Send= (listname)
>
> I don't know if multipleSEND= are stackable (append) or override one another.  Nevertheless, one of
> the lists that I operate called listA has this as a SEND
>
>
> * Send= Private,(listB)
>
> listB subscribers can post to listA.
>
> /Pete
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
>
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1