Fri, 6 Aug 1993 18:13:27 +0200
|
I don't like the idea of reducing the size of the cyclic cache below the
daily threshold because it can then no longer guarantee that duplicates
are not posted. In the case of an occasional duplicate due to a one-time
line failure right in the small time window where the protocols cause the
message to be resent yet the receiving site has accepted delivery, there
will be no problem. But when a mailer goes crazy, it is likely to
generate duplicates for several messages, such that you will be under
attack from a number of "waves" and, with network delays, the messages
will be interleaved. If you set the cache size to, say, 3, you may end up
delivering the duplicates. I would much rather implement something based
on a time stamp, but again the target date is 1.8b since that is when
LSVXMAIL will be rewritten in PASCAL and I don't want to write code that
is not critically needed and that I will need to trash 2 months later.
Eric
|
|
|