This is the kind of harassing B.S. that I get in my mail everyday that
makes me want to quit being a listowner.  Is there any way to find out
who sent this message?  Apparently the message was sent to some type
of relay, I wonder how many aggravated listowners got this message?
Is that all you have to do is send a message to:
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
and it will be mailed out to multiple lists?  Seems really stupid that
it could be that easy to send out harassing mail.
 
>From [log in to unmask] Jul 21 17:59:02 1995
>Date: Thu, 20 Jul 1995 22:44:55 -0400
>From: "L-Soft list server at UBVM (1.8b)" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: "Lt. John H. Jordan (UNIVPD-L listowner)" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Problem processing mail file from [log in to unmask]
>
>An     error    occurred     while    processing     file    8039     from
>[log in to unmask]: "Mail has been received for delivery to the
>UNIVPD-L list from a user which had been served out".
>
>------------------- Message causing the problem (74 lines)
>Return-Path:
><@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU,@VM1.NODAK.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from UBVM (NJE origin SMTP@UBVM) by UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (LMail
>          V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7118; Thu, 20 Jul 1995 22:42:59 -0400
>Received: from VM1.NoDak.EDU by UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
>with TCP;
>   Thu, 20 Jul 95 22:42:57 EDT
>Received: from physics1.byu.edu by VM1.NoDak.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
>TCP;
>   Thu, 20 Jul 95 21:42:02 CDT
>Date: Thu, 20 Jul 1995 19:37:35 -0700
>To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
> [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
> [log in to unmask]
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: letter from Olga!  =)
>         (Unverified)
>
>
>     Not to long ago, I posted a message re: meeting women of the former
>soviet union through romance ads.
>
>     In August, Olga will travel to Moscow from her home in Kiev, Ukraine.
>In Moscow, Olga will have a much easier and cost efficient means to place
>your personal romance ad throughout Russia.
>
>Last week I received the following from Olga:
>
>     "I have already sent your ad to the papers in such towns: Moscow,
>St. Petersburg, Vladimir, Kazan.  At nearest future I will send your ad
>to the paper in some more 12 towns of Russia, where papers are published.
>     Some times (in winter, spring & now) I placed your ad in other papers,
>but they are not most popular paper in Moscow and some large cities of
>Russia.
>     Besides, I am continuing to place your ad in papers of Ukraine.  I
>promise to place your ad in some other papers when I will come to Moscow in
>August.  I am glad that you have received fairly many letters from Russian &
>Ukrainian girls and I think you will received some more ones and will find
>your ideal in my country soon.
>     I thank you very much ones more for your kindness & your help.
>My best wishes,
>
>Olga"
>
>     This isn't a scam - call it panhandling if you want. . . I sent her $40
>or $50 and I've received over 45 responses.  Unlike placing romance ads in
>the U.S., women from the former USSR respond.  Although one would guess the
>are doing so in the hopes of American citizenship, I haven't found it so.
>
>     Olga lives in Kiev, Ukraine (population 3 million) and will travel to
>Moscow in August to visit her father.  If you were to send a letter this
>week, she would receive it in time.  The population of Moscow is 10 million
>-- (3 times the size of Los Angeles.)
>
>     Feel free to send a letter and ask her your questions.  She will be
>happy to respond.
>
>Olga's address:
>
>Ukraine
>Kiev 253121
>Dekabristov Street 5 - 178
>Olga Kozmina
>
>     I am posting anonymously because of the flames and volume of inquiries
>that would result otherwise.  I think those who are truely interested will
>take the time to write.
>_____________________________________________________________________________
>To: probable flamer
>Subject: polite note
>
>     Although Olga has never seen a newsgroup nor heard of "net-etiquette,"
>she believes that offering lonely singles the possibility of romance exceeds
>the cost of angering those who feel the net shouldn't be used in this
>fashion.
>     IHA (I humbly ask) that you not flame the postmaster of this site.
>
>peace. . .
>
>