>Turgut, you have a strange definition of "up to date"... What really puzzles
>me is where they have *managed* to find these outdated tables - it's very hard
>nowadays to find 3-weeks-old tables, you find either up to date ones, tables
>dating back to the split of responsibilities between you and me, or really
>ancient tables like 2 years old... /Eric
>
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>Revised LISTSERV, version 1.5o, managed by:
> NETOP@ICNUCEVM
>
>Master nodes file version: 89/10/14 11:47:39
>Peers file version:        89/10/02 16:34:21
>Link weights file version: 89/10/02 16:37:25
 
Seems strange that we never here from UKACRL or ICNUCEVM on this list.  Could
be that thay just don't care about the rest of the network and they know that
EARN will do anything they ask.  Do people from their nodes run EARN or what?
 
Chad Adams <XCEA@ECNCDC>