>At 10:31 04/10/00 -0400, Jacob Haller wrote:
>
>>I don't see where either piece of mail was delayed in the messages
>>whose headers you included. I don't know if that's relevent or not.
>
>
>Hello. No, this headers arenīt relevant. Are an example. I can send
>you the delayed mail
I think that would be useful.
>>One thing that comes to mind is that I know that some versions of
>>Netscape for Unix had a bug which resulted in an invalid Sender:
>
>The user have netscape in window 95
OK, my previous comment wasn't relevent then.
Thanks,
--
Jacob Haller, Technical Support
L-Soft international, Inc
http://www.lsoft.com/
