> Has anyone else had problems requesting fixes from
 LISTSERV@SEARN? I'm submitting the request from the registered
 :contact. ID in PEERS NAMES.
 
 
 Forwarded message:
 
 > From @ricevm1.rice.edu:[log in to unmask]  Thu Aug 16 16:08:54 1990
 > Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
 > Date:         Thu, 16 Aug 90 22:09:55 O
 > From: Revised List Processor (1.6e) <[log in to unmask]>
 > Subject:      Output of your job "DBOYES"
 > To: [log in to unmask]
 >
 > > GET 16E-0020 FIX
 > File "16E-0020 FIX" from filelist LFIXES is not
 > available.
 >
 
 . . . . lines omitted for brevity. . . .
 
 > > GET 16E-0060 FIX
 > File "16E-0060 FIX" from filelist LFIXES is not
 > available.
 >
 >
 > Summary of resource utilization
 > -------------------------------
 >  CPU time:       17.97 sec                 Device I/O:   194
 >  Overhead CPU:    1.75 sec                 Paging I/O:    16
 >  CPU model:       9375                     DASD model:  9335
 >
 
 
 Eric?