Just for information and thought.
--Frank
------------- Forwarded mail ---
Date:         Wed, 13 Jul 88 10:45:54 EST
Reply-To:     General network forum <INFONETS@DB0TUI11>
Sender:       General network forum <INFONETS@DB0TUI11>
From:         Murph Sewall <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Re:Bitnet/Internet gateway
Comments: To: Operations Manager <[log in to unmask]>,
              Info-Nets List <[log in to unmask]>
Comments: cc: [log in to unmask]
To:           Frank Elsner <181@DB0TUZ01>
In-Reply-To:  Message of Mon,
              11 Jul 88 15:46:12 edt from <[log in to unmask]>
 
 [ ... deleted due to other topic ... ]
 
BTW: (Completely different subject) - I note that info-nets messages arrive
from LISTSERV with "Reply-To: INFONETS@listserv_node" rather than
"Reply-To: [log in to unmask]" (as is the practice on an arpa-list
redistribution I subscribe too).  LOTS of people know how to use the
"reply" command and may not pay enough attention to where the reply
actually is going.  Hence, it would help if the BITNET maintainer fixed
the "Reply-To" field in the list header even more than editing the
message returned on subscription.
 
Murph Sewall     [log in to unmask]
Business School  [log in to unmask]          [INTERNET]
U of Connecticut {rutgers psuvax1 ucbvax & in Europe - mcvax}
                 !UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL                        [UUCP]
 
-+- My employer isn't responsible for my mistakes AND vice-versa!
            (subject to change without notice; void where prohibited)
 
"It might help if we ran the MBA's out of Washington." - Adm Grace Hopper