Wed, 6 Sep 1995 20:51:04 EDT
|
On Tue, 5 Sep 1995 20:45:16 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>On Tue, 5 Sep 1995 20:02:37 +0200 Turgut Kalfaoglu
><[log in to unmask]> said:
>
>>And, can we begin hoping for an OS/2 version? -turgut
>
>The 12 customer offer still stands. Find me 12 customers who will buy a
>license (not the shareware version, the normal commercial version, any
>capacity) and we will port it. This does not include people who are
>totally convinced that we will sell 2,000,000 copies of LISTSERV if we
>port it to OS/2. There are many such people, but unless they're
>interested in actually making a purchase themselves, they don't count,
>because convictions don't pay bills. I've been making this offer for over
>a year and have yet to see more than 3 names. Incidentally, I thought
We'd at least think about it. I would buy a LMail for OS/2, depending on
price and if it replaced sendmail entirely.
>OS/2 was going to be able to run Win32 applications. If that's true, the
>Win95 version will run under OS/2, maybe with a tiny change here and
It can run WIN32S binaries at the 1.20(?) level. I think Windows 95 v1.0 is
at the 1.25 level. OS/2 does now support WIN32S at the source level
in some developer's kit.
>there to say "OS/2" rather than "Windows 4.0" and the like. If you want
>to try this I recommend a non-graphical install (intel.zip + unzip with
>long filename support + installation guide).
>
> Eric
/ahw
|
|
|