 
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 1997 10:18:53 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
Your message of "Thu, 13 Nov 1997 08:36:12 EST."
<l03110700b090b2988ed5@[146.138.74.206]> |
| Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1548570760P"; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| Comments: |
|
On Thu, 13 Nov 1997 08:36:12 EST, you said:
> I got the following message this morning. What's it mean? I thought L-Soft
> kept the peers table up-to-date?
> >Job origin: [log in to unmask]
> >Actual ("FROM=") origin: [log in to unmask]
LSoft automagically updates the files *for the backbone servers*. The problem is
that there's a lot of non-backbone servers that don't have a *clue* on how to
keep up to date, and even after I've sent them "Type *THIS*" instructions, they
are still backleveled.
The top of my hit list are 2 bitnet sites that are running the 9512 and 9510
tables (yes, two *YEARS* out of date). And you'd *THINK* that the people at
"CNET: THE COMPUTER NETWORK" could do better than 9603, which they were running
up until Oct 3 (when the 9710 tables went out. To their credit, they *are* now
on the 9711 tables.
AND YO! A-O-HELL! [log in to unmask] is *still* at 9603.
Sorry, but public embarassment seems to be the only way to motivate some of
these sites.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
|
|
|
