Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote on Mon, 15 Nov 1993 18:39:
> [...]
> I frankly don't understand what this is supposed to mean. There is no
> relationship between the structure of the BITNET core and the amount of
> CPU time or disk space used up by LISTSERV, unless you start counting
> individual kilobytes. There is a version of LISTSERV that can work
> without NJE. L-Soft announced a joint study a couple weeks ago through
> which this new version will be tested in production on several sites. It
> will definitely be available by July; all the code has been written, it
> just needs to be tested in a real-life situation and debugged as
> necessary.
The point is if LISTSERV will run on some sort of Unix box, Rice
and many others are simply going to dump their mainframe...
Is L-Soft also going to implement a (true) Unix listserv sometime in the
future?
+gg
--
Gerhard Gonter //////// CyberSpace <[log in to unmask]>
Tel: +43/1/31336/4111 //// the final //// <[log in to unmask]>
Fax: +43/1/31336/702 frontier ////////// <[log in to unmask]>