Hi kids.
Post came to me for review (from rec.music.dylan, the usenet side of the
gateway), I okayed it -- it looked normal-ish. Here's what I okayed:
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Sender: <[log in to unmask]>
>Path: auvm!paladin.american.edu!02-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!news.ecrc.de!
> news.nacamar.de!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!feed
> 1.news.erols.com!news.dra.com!news.starnet.net!news.cc.ukans.edu!usenet
>From: "Matthew T. Kneidel" <[log in to unmask]>
>Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan
>Subject: Re: Look a likes...
>Date: Sat, 07 Dec 1996 17:36:58 -0600
>Organization: kumc.edu
>Lines: 23
>Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>References: <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: 1624, W., Pine, Wichita, KS, 67203
^^^^^ ^^ ^^^^ ^ ^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^^^
>NNTP-Posting-Host: two.shiva.uksm-w.kumc.edu
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
>
>LuBill Burns - High End Server Systems wrote:
[...]
Below, I've enclosed what was then posted (approved by me) to HWY61-L.
Haven't seen how it comes through in a digest yet. I imagine that
will drop all but the first "name" and "address"?
How'd he do it? What's he up to? His Reply-To: line in the message
submitted to me for review is the key, but how/why did they all assume
the @listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu address? Anybody???
I've put a filter on this guy until I understand what he's trying to do.
Does anyone know of a reason for doing this in ummm... choosing
my words carefully ... the real world of responsible people acting in
good faith?
Thanks everbody -- as always. :-)
Maureen
(HWY61-L)
circumnavigatin' the globe with LISTSERV ;-)
The message that came through after I'd approved his post:
>From: MX%"[log in to unmask]",MX%"[log in to unmask]",MX
>%"[log in to unmask]",MX%"[log in to unmask]",MX%"KS@
>LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU",MX%"[log in to unmask]"
>To: MX%"[log in to unmask]"
>CC:
>Subj: Re: Look a likes...
>
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu by taurus.cc.umb.edu (MX V4.2 VAX)
> with SMTP; Sun, 08 Dec 1996 14:05:11 EST
>Received: (qmail 29068 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1996 19:01:29 -0000
>Received: from listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu (128.205.7.35) by
> listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 8 Dec 1996 19:01:29 -0000
>Received: from LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU by LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
> (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8c) with spool id 6035697 for
> [log in to unmask]; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 14:01:19 -0500
>Received: (qmail 28768 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1996 19:01:08 -0000
>Received: from listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu (128.205.7.35) by
> listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 8 Dec 1996 19:01:08 -0000
>Approved-By: [log in to unmask]
>Received: (qmail 26909 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1996 03:12:57 -0000
>Received: from AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU ([log in to unmask]) by listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu
> with SMTP; 8 Dec 1996 03:12:56 -0000
>Received: from AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU by AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
> BSMTP id 4724; Sat, 07 Dec 96 22:11:14 EST
>Received: from AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU (NJE origin NETNEWS@AUVM) by AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2821; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 22:11:15 -0500
>Path: auvm!paladin.american.edu!02-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!news.ecrc.de!
> news.nacamar.de!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!fe
>ed 1.news.erols.com!news.dra.com!news.starnet.net!news.cc.ukans.edu!usenet
>Lines: 23
>References: <[log in to unmask]>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: two.shiva.uksm-w.kumc.edu
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
>Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 17:36:58 -0600
>Reply-To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
> [log in to unmask],
> [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
> [log in to unmask]
>Sender: The Bob Dylan Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
>From: "Matthew T. Kneidel" <[log in to unmask]>
>Organization: kumc.edu
>Subject: Re: Look a likes...
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>LuBill Burns - High End Server Systems wrote:
[...]
|
