|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Oct 1992 15:13:01 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
> I fully understand why the mail was rejected - because of the From:
> line in the mail, and I have no problem with that except that I didn't
> see why a properly quoted (with the > in front) line should be taken as
> a reject.
>
> However, I am sure that I have never seen a rejected mail item that
> has had the error prefixed with the > sign.
At first I too thought that the presence of the > would eliminate
the problem, but that's not the case. UCLA has (or at least had) a mail
system that insists on quoting the entire mail message, header and all, and
although all the lines are prefaced by >, mail from UCLA repeatedly gets
rejected by LISTSERV.
Joan Korenman, WMST-L Listowner KORENMAN@UMBC
Univ. of MD. Baltimore County [log in to unmask]
Baltimore, Maryland 21228-5398
|
|
|