LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines)
Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:27:02 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
At 16:10 10/31/2006 Tuesday, Steve Howie wrote:
>Does any know if there is a legitimate need for the "other" listserv ids associated with each list (i.e. owner-listname-request, listname-subscribe-request etc.) to receive incoming emails addressed directly to those ids?
>
>We're looking at rejecting such emails from the outside to cut down on a lot of the crap Listserv is currently forced to process.

Well other than the fact that they ae well-known/documented addresses for all lists at all sites, I suggest that those incoming emails not be rejected, but silently discarded IF you are dead set on changing something.  Back-scat-er [sic] to a third-party innocent just propagates the problem.

Better to have your own system bit-bucket.

Just my 2 bits.


/Pete 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2