Has anyone, perchance, seen this before? I'm copying this to our
listmanager, but he's gone home for the day. We're using 1.8a. I bounced
back a post that had been flagged as coming from a nonsubbed address. The
usual routine. It had the usual message:
-----------------
This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask] to the TRNSPLNT
list at WUVMD. If you simply forward it back to the list, it will be
distributed with the paragraph you are now reading being automatically removed.
etc.
-----------------
This is all routine. Has worked hundreds of times before. Nothing's been
changed with my mail software, least not that I'm aware of. I'm getting
back a seemingly endless train of error messages which read:
-----------------
The enclosed mail file, found in the TRNSPLNT reader and shown under the
spoolid 5242 in the console log, has been identified as a possible delivery
error notice for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field
pointing to the list has been found in mail body.
------------------------- Message in error (73 lines) -------------------------
Return-Path: <@WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from WUVMD (NJE origin SMTP@WUVMD) by WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU (LMail
V1.1d/1.7
f) with BSMTP id 3861 for <TRNSPLNT@WUVMD>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 16:30:19 -0600
Received: from metgate.metro.org by WUVMD.Wustl.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with
TCP;
Wed, 04 Dec 96 16:30:05 CST
Report-Version: 2
>To: WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU!TRNSPLNT
To: WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU!TRNSPLNT
Date: Wed Dec 4 23:25:11 GMT 1996
Original-Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:49:00 -0600
Original-Subject: Re: Cranberries, Grapefruit, Pineapple
End-of-Header:
Not-Delivered-To: due to 12 Inability To Transfer
ORIGINAL MESSAGE ATTACHED
(rmail: Error # 2 'Problem with mailfile')
En-Route-To: nyrtp1
Content-Length: 3040
Content-Type: text
Received: from WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU by metgate.metro.org; Wed, 4 Dec 96 18:25 EST
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com by vms.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a)
with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 16:49:32 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:49:00 -0600
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:49:00 -0600
Reply-To: "Organ transplant recipients and anyone else intested in the
issues." <[log in to unmask]>
etc.
------------------------------
I haven't seen this metgate.metro.org before. If I'm reading this right,
that seems to be where the problem is. Should I try to contact someone
there to get whatever this is purged?
Thanks,
============================================================================
Mike Holloway |* On average, 8 people a day on the waiting list
[log in to unmask] | for a transplant die for lack of a donor.
___________________________|* The end-stage diseases treated by transplant
do not recognize age, race, nationality or pocketbook.
* There is no justifiable reason to deny organ donation, but many myths and
misunderstandings.
* Next of kin must allow donation. Your family must know your wishes.
* Only a small fraction of the next of kin of potential donors allow
donation to take place.
* In general, medical professionals do not recognize their obligation to
support and promote donation.
Questions? See FAQ:
http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/internet/news/faq/bit.listserv.transplant.html or
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/bit.listserv.transplant/
=============================================================================
|
