|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:20:21 -0300 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
At 07:11 PM 7/26/01 -0400, Stan Horwitz eloquently wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Richard W. Wood wrote:
> > >
> > >For just a few mailing lists, it might be much more cost-effective to
> > >have the lists hosted directly by L-Soft instead of on your own server.
> > >See their web site for details.
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion, but if I'm using the free version, how can
> > paying them be more cost effective?
>
>I said it might be more cost effective. The keyword is "might". You need
>to decide for yourself if the value of your time maintaining your server
>and the cost of Internet service for the server is worthwhile.
I have a 24 hr connection, and I'm currently running a very basic
list server as part of the email server software, but I find it doesn't
have the features I need. The number of posts at this point is very low and
time is not a factor, so my only need is to know if I can run Listserv on a
machine on the LAN that is not directly connected to the net.
Thanks.
RW Wood
=========================================================
Visit Greater Grace in Argentina - http://www.every-nation.com/Argentina/
=========================================================
|
|
|