|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:46:58 +0000 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Pauline,
At 14:37 98/06/01 -0500, Pauline M. Marshall wrote:
>I was wondering, is there any way to set up a list, so that all the
>listowners are notified when a subscription is altered, but not the
>subscriber. My situation: I co-own a list with Pam. I want Pam, but not
>the subscriber to know when I set them to review, or to nomail etc. If I
>do it with a 'quiet' command, I am the only one who gets notified, but if
>I don't put the quiet in, the subscriber gets a notification. Is this
>possible?
My solution to this problem is to send my co-owner a CC of the command I
send to LISTSERV. If necessary, I also add a line explaining why I took
the action. I use a line that says
// eoj
to keep LISTSERV from treating my explanation as a command.
Sometimes my commands don't work. In these cases, I forward the response
from LISTSERV to the other owner if I think they need to know that it did
not work.
Peace, Dan
<< Daniel D. Wheeler - Education & Psychology, Univ. of Cincinnati >>
<< Email: [log in to unmask] URL: http://oz.uc.edu/~wheeledd/ >>
|
|
|