At 20:11 12/05/2001 Wednesday, Winship wrote:
 >I think I may have answered my own question.  I just checked
 >the distributed items via
 >s * in listname from 1/12/5
 >
 >and it shows 67 items distributed.  Of course, there were far more
 >than that as the search looks only for items with the 1/12/5 date and
 >the were many items date of 1/12/3 and 1/12/4 (had a bit of a problem,
 >late distribution of some items).  The 67 items is a lie, therefor,
 >in my sense, but it will serve.

There is another problem with interpretting the count of the SEARCH
Results.  It doesn't reflect items processed by LISTSERV(R) on that date
(range), only what the poster's MUA had stuck in the RFC822 Date: field,
which sometimes is terrify "off."