|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Sep 1998 01:36:45 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
In-Reply-To: |
<v03110710b226faba5da8@[206.152.10.82]> |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
it may be just me, but this seems just more to confuse the subscriber.
i mean, sometimes it seems a full time job explaining listname@...
listserv@... , listname-request@... , owner-listname@..., and no,
listname-request@... on majordomo is not the same as listname-request@...
on listserv, and for listproc that should be...
if we have trouble getting them to distinguish between the list address
and the listserv address, because they insist on calling the list a
listserv, will there not be more confusion with this? for listserv
has it not always been that listname-request@... is for getting in
touch with a live body rather than a computer program, and this is
exactly the opposite?
douglas
|
|
|