Dear Listowners:
 
The problem with Bucknell continues (I've called campus security there
and tried to convince them that sending out 25 error messages an hour
continuously, conceivably for days, could do serious damage to people
with small mailboxes who might not check the mail until next Tuesday).
 
In the meantime I've discovered the following interesting batch-job
which is part of the look of error messages sent out to everyone (well,
maybe it's just me, but I doubt it . . .):
 
 
    #1           1-SEP-1996 00:37:44.19         NEWMAIL
From:SMTP%"[log in to unmask]"
To:  FACSHAFERI
CC:
Subj:
 
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 01:25:02 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
Originator: [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: bulk
From:
To: Multiple recipients of list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Discussion Group
 
Batch SMTP transaction log follows:
 
220 SRUVM.SRU.EDU Columbia MAILER R2.10 ptf008 BSMTP service ready.
050 HELO SRU
250 SRUVM.SRU.EDU Hello SRU
050 MAIL FROM:<[log in to unmask]>
250-<[log in to unmask]> does not correspond to RSCS origin of SRU      SMTP.
250 You are a charlatan.
050 RCPT TO:<maf4937@SRU>
250 <maf4937@SRU>... recipient OK.
050 DATA
354 Start mail input.  End with <crlf>.<crlf>
554-Mail not delivered to some or all recipients:
554 No such local user: MAF4937
050 QUIT
221 SRUVM.SRU.EDU Columbia MAILER BSMTP service done.
 
Original message follows:
 
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
 
Received: from SRU (SMTP) by SRUVM.SRU.EDU (Mailer R2.10 ptf008) with BSMTP id
 4709; Sat, 31 Aug 96 19:56:57 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by SRUVM.SRU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP;
   Sat, 31 Aug 96 19:56:56 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
     (5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA12713; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 19:56:05 -0400
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 19:56:05 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
Originator: [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: bulk
From:
To: Multiple recipients of list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Discussion Group
 
The mail you sent could not be delivered to:
550 [log in to unmask] is not a known user
 
The text you sent follows:
 
>From <@reef.bucknell.edu:[log in to unmask]>  Sat Aug 31 18:54:49 1996
Return-Path: <@reef.bucknell.edu:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu (reef.bucknell.edu [134.82.7.6]) by emin20.mail
 .aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA04913; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 18:54:46 -0400
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
     (5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA10155; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 18:51:22 -0400
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 18:51:22 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
Originator: [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: bulk
To: Multiple recipients of list <[log in to unmask]>
 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Discussion Group
 
|------------------------- Message log follows: -------------------------|
 no valid recipients were found for this message
|------------------------- Failed addresses follow: ---------------------|
 <[log in to unmask]> ... unknown user
|------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|
Received: from mailin00.btx.dtag.de ([194.25.2.140])
     by pop00.btx.dtag.de with  smtp (S3.1.29.1)
     id <m0uwy9F-000Q3ba>; Sun, 1 Sep 96 00:04 MET DST
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu ([134.82.7.6]) by mailin00.btx.dtag.de with
      smtp (S3.1.29.1) id <m0uwy8t-0003Fna>; Sun, 1 Sep 96 00:03 MET DST
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
     (5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA07265; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 17:57:52 -0400
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 17:57:52 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
 
Originator: [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: bulk
From: Ralph Dumain <[log in to unmask]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re:  DUQUETTE ON SYSTEM & METHOD
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Discussion Group
 
[low-priority message, body not included]
    ********************************************************************
When I tried to set myself nomail I received the following note:
 
    #3143        1-SEP-1996 00:32:02.74
From:SMTP%"[log in to unmask]"
To:  FACSHAFERI
CC:
Subj:Error Condition Re: Invalid request
 
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 01:31:16 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Error Condition Re: Invalid request
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Bucknell University ListProcessor
 
>set hegel-l nomail
 
SET: Unknown list name HEGEL-L
 
Report any problems to [log in to unmask]
 
   **********************************************************************
 
What are they doing calling themselves "listserv"!  Obviously this is a LISTPROC list.
 
 
 
Any suggestions?
 
Ingrid
[log in to unmask]  &  [log in to unmask]