|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 12:25:22 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
From: |
|
On 4 Sep 00, at 17:04, Winship <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I think what we may have here is a conflict between the "real" list,
> which is influenced only by email commands, and the "web interface"
> list, call it the "ghost" list. Ed Agro has indicated he works via the
> interface, and so do his subscribers. There is plenty of evidence that
> the "real" and the "ghost" do not always talk to each other; the right and
> left do not always know what the other is doing/has done.
That's not true. The web interface sends commands to LISTSERV to get
it's work done. The fact that it does it by talking directly to
LISTSERV over TCP/IP rather than by sending emails does not make any
difference. LISTSERV receives the same commands and processes them
exactly the same. It has separate code for *receiving* the commands
via TCP/IP vs. SMTP, but it's the exact same code that processes them.
My guess about the addresses that had "[concealed]" tacked on to
their name but where the addresses were not actually concealed is
that someone did a REVIEW ALL and used the results to repopulate the
list in a bulk add.
Francoise
|
|
|