|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jul 1995 18:21:24 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
I have a few questions about proposed system changes and would appreciate
any thought on possible problems that could arise.
1. The documentation gives this usage for the reply-to field:
***************************************************
* Reply-To= <destination>,Respect | Ignore | Both *
***************************************************
Indicates whether the "Reply-to:" tag supplied by the sender of the mail file
is to be preserved or discarded (if present), and, if discarded or omitted,
what should be placed in the new "Reply-to:" generated by the server.
Is this feature widely used?
If reply-to is set to Ignore, what are some possible problems?
If the setting is ignore, will this also delete the reply-to line from the
notebook files (my goal)?
2. My notebook files have reached 780 K. I know that the size of the files
can be indirectly controlled by setting the closeout period to a set time
frame or a number of messages.
Are there any general guidelines for notebook file size and desirable system
performance or network throughput?
Mike Jones ([log in to unmask])
|
|
|