As you may know, the following (kind of) message is regularly posted to
the nodmgt-l list.  What are the con's of using this info (deleted
nodes) to purge subscribers from lists that one maintains e.g.,
 
   QUIET DEL * *@bucknell
   (etc)
 
/Pete
 
  - - The original note follows - -
 
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 1992 14:19:58 CET
Sender:       Node Management <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Hans-Ulrich Giese <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      new/del nods for 9211
 
friends,
 
it's again time for new tables, so here comes the list of new/del
nodes for 9211 :
 
new nodes:
ACADEM01 0713 MX BITNET
UTPVM1   2052 PA BITNET
IUAZURE  0794 US BITNET
LBDRSCS  0799 US BITNET
NIHCOCC  0817 US BITNET
NIHOD31E 0833 US BITNET
PSUBEH1  0914 US BITNET
PSUEDVAX 0992 US BITNET
PSULEPSJ 1296 US BITNET
PSULEPS5 1660 US BITNET
RIGEL    1661 US BITNET
TAHOMA   1686 US BITNET
TCUFVMS  1745 US BITNET
WISCPS   2061 US BITNET
CNEIPH51 0112 CH EARN
DHDIBMIP 0204 DE EARN
EARNCC   0351 FR EARN
IRMICMAT 0467 IT EARN
IRMRETI  0623 IT EARN
SUYARS   0712 SU EARN
 
deleted nodes:
BKNLVMS  BNLVMA    BNLVMXA   BUCKNELL  CGEHCU61  CORNELLE  CORNELLF
DBNPIB5  DHDIBM1B  DM0MPB51  FRORL01   GBGBOX    IPDUNIV   PRATT
PSULEPSI PSULEPSR  QCVAX     SFBSYS    TUFTS     UGACDC1   UGA205
UTORDAIS VPIVAX6   VTELLIPS  VTHOBBES  VTNFNITY  VTYR