|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Aug 1996 02:07:17 +0200 |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Wed, 7 Aug 1996 19:43:20 -0400 from LISTSERV list
owners' forum < [log in to unmask]> |
Reply-To: |
|
On Wed, 7 Aug 1996 19:43:20 -0400 George Buckner <[log in to unmask]>
said:
>Thus we don't have to worry about which header settings are public and
>which are hidden. Thus when a new owner sets review=owner it does as
>he/she might reasonably expect it to do --not give any part of the list
>including the header to anyone but the owner. Thus when an owner wants
>to prevent access to certain header information, he/she has a relatively
>straightforward way to do it without sacrificing list visibility in the
>LIST-OF-LISTS.
As you said, this is just another tradeoff. What if I don't want to have
"Review= Owner" but do want to hide the list of naughty people? What if I
want to keep the list of subscribers confidential, but keep the list
header public? Finally, technically the list of lists is a collection of
list headers. How do you want to archive your list if it doesn't have a
header? How is the database filled in, who is the owner, etc?
Eric
|
|
|