|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:41:16 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
Quoted-printable |
From: |
|
Randy,
Thank you for your input. But I don't like the extra job of approving
postings from non-subscribers -- which in most cases is mail from
subscribers using an alternate address, so they are actually
subscribers after all -- I tried that for a couple of weeks, but it
meant sitting and approving messages all day. In an average of
between 250 and 350 messages per day a lot were from non-listed
addresses. And I want less job, not more :-)
Is it really such a stupid idea if Listserv had a default function
where only existing top level domains were allowed to post to lists.
When it's possible to ban attachments, why not nonexisting top
domains? I wish someone would explain.
Helge.
[log in to unmask], Tolk- och översättarinstitutet / Institute for Interpretation and Translation studies, Stockholms universitet, S-106 91 Stockholm. Tel. +468162000. Fax +468161396. Home phone & fax +46854067243. <http://lisa.tolk.su.se/defhelge.html>
|
|
|