LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"C.W.Turner" <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 6 Oct 1992 08:59:26 CST
text/plain (20 lines)
    I am a relativaly new list owner and I have a question. My list recently
received a long posting that turned out to be a chain letter (over 500 lines).
It is my understanding that the waste of server time and resources that stem
from this sort of thing are against net protocols. I am wondering what sort of
response I should take to this action. The user did add a small bit of comment
based on the lists discussion topic, but he acknologed that it was " to make
his post a legitimate post. I feel that using the topic knowing he was
*covering* the chain letter by posting legitimate information, he was aware of
the fact he had breached net protocols. A bit of guidance as to how I should
handle this would be greatly apreciated.
 
                                              C.W.Turner
                                       GT2150@SIUCVMB           (BITNET)
                                       [log in to unmask]   (INTNET)
                                       [log in to unmask]    (INTNET)
                                       [log in to unmask]    (FREENET)
 
    I know that such posting at the university I work at will result in the
loss of your accounts and all access to the nets. Is this to stiff?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2