|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:56:30 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.GSO.4.44.0211291050590.26470-100000@artemis> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
At 10:52 11/29/2002 Friday, Douglas Palmer wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Rich Greenberg wrote:
>
>> Pete's suggestion of probing is probably the next best way but takes
>> time. Possibly cut it to 7 or 10 days rather than 30, then once the
>> probe finds and removes them, cut it back to a longer interval, like
>> quarterly.
>
>Can't you select tomorrow as a specific probe date... then just remove the
>date from the setting after the probes go out? IIRC, that should be the
>quickest way possible to generate probe messages.
Yes, but I didn't think "quick" was not necessary since this has been
going on for a long time. Keeping the periodic passive probe seems like
a good idea to me.
/P
|
|
|